A major security lapse happened during a rally where former President Donald Trump was nearly assassinated. The Secret Service, particularly its head, Kimberly Cheatle, orchestrated a security failure that allowed a gunman to get within 130 yards of Trump and fire multiple shots. Eyewitnesses reported seeing the shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, crawl onto a rooftop and fire at Trump, an event captured on video. Security experts and former agents describe the incident as a “catastrophic failure,” citing breakdowns in pre-event planning and response. Questions arise about why security was less stringent compared to previous rallies and why requests for enhanced protection were denied. It also seems that political rhetoric by democrats and their MSM groups may have incited the shooter.

Unanswered Questions Surrounding the Shooting

A deep dive into expert opinions and eyewitness accounts reveals numerous inconsistencies and alarming details about the security breach. Below are critical questions that every American should consider regarding the Trump shooting incident.

How Did the Shooter Get So Close?

One of the most pressing questions is how the shooter, identified as Thomas Matthew Crooks of Bethel Park, Pennsylvania, managed to get so close to Trump without detection. Reports indicate that Crooks was able to crawl onto a roof just 130 yards away from where Trump was speaking. This location provided a clear line of sight, yet the shooter was able to fire at least eight shots before being neutralized. This scenario raises significant concerns about the situational awareness and preparedness of the Secret Service.

Fundamental Security Failures

Former SWAT commander Steve Nottingham described the incident as a “fundamental security failure.” Nottingham, who has extensive experience in securing high-profile events, pointed out that the roofs with direct lines of sight to the president should have been covered by security personnel. The absence of such basic precautions suggests a serious lapse in the pre-event scouting and real-time monitoring processes.

Ignored Warnings

A witness at the rally stated that he repeatedly tried to alert law enforcement about a man with a gun, but his warnings were ignored. This individual, wearing a “Trump 2024” visor, noticed the shooter crawling up a rooftop and attempted to report the suspicious activity. The lack of response from the authorities is troubling and indicative of a communication breakdown within the security apparatus. Was it a purposeful breakdown in communication or just incompetence? Nothing is just a coincidence.

Shooter’s Mobility

Another eyewitness reported seeing the shooter move from roof to roof before commencing his attack. If attendees could observe this movement, it is perplexing that the Secret Service did not detect it. This observation further underscores the deficiencies in the surveillance and monitoring systems in place. Were surveillance and monitoring systems purposely turned off and did Secret Service agents turn a blind eye?

Delayed Response

Video footage of the incident reveals a concerning delay in the Secret Service’s response. After Trump was shot, several seconds passed before agents reached him. In a high-stakes situation, such delays can be the difference between life and death. Former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino called this episode a “catastrophic failure,” emphasizing that no excuses should be made for the profound lapses in security protocols.

Comparing Security Measures

Attendees at the rally noted a stark contrast between the security measures in place at this event compared to previous Trump rallies. Robert D. Philpot, who had attended a previous rally at the Pittsburgh-Butler Regional Airport, observed that every rooftop was manned by armed security personnel. The noticeable absence of similar measures at the recent rally is inexplicable and concerning. Are we supposed to believe that it was just a coincidence that security was lower at this event than in any other?

Denied Requests for Enhanced Protection

U.S. Representative Mike Waltz alleged that Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas had repeatedly denied requests for stronger Secret Service protection for Trump. If true, this decision warrants scrutiny, especially in light of the recent security breach.

We know that just months ago, high-ranking democrats tried to revoke President Trump’s Secret Service protection. Was this too just a coincidence?

Impact of Inflammatory Rhetoric

Senator J.D. Vance pointed out the potential influence of inflammatory rhetoric on the shooter’s actions. The Biden campaign’s portrayal of Trump as “an authoritarian fascist who must be stopped at all costs” may have contributed to the climate that led to the assassination attempt. Additionally, Biden’s recent comment about putting a “bullseye” on Trump is particularly troubling given the timing of the shooting.

Political Ramifications

The shooting’s timing, just before the Republican convention, raises questions about its potential impact on the general election. Had Trump been assassinated on July 13, 2024, before the Republican Convention (July 15-18th), he would not be the Republican nominee. Who would have come out of the Convention as the replacement nominee?

Historically, such incidents can result in a surge of support for the targeted individual. For example, Ronald Reagan’s poll numbers significantly increased after he was shot. Preliminary data suggest a similar trend for Trump, with betting odds on his reelection improving dramatically following the shooting.

Insights

1. The security failure was unprecedented and systemic.
2. Eyewitnesses’ warnings were ignored by law enforcement.
3. Comparisons to past security measures highlight the lapses.
4. Political rhetoric is implied to have played a role in the incident.

The Essence (80/20)The Origins and Evolution of the 80/20 Principle The Discovery by Vilfredo Pareto In 1897, Italian economist Vilfredo Pareto uncovered a striking pattern in his study of wealth and... More

Core Topics:

• Security Lapse: Detailed analysis of the Secret Service’s failure to prevent the assassination attempt, with specific criticisms aimed at leadership and operational execution.
• Eyewitness Reports: Accounts from rally attendees who saw the shooter and tried to warn authorities, emphasizing ignored warnings and visible lapses in security.
• Expert Opinions: Insights from security experts and former Secret Service agents on what went wrong, highlighting fundamental flaws in planning and response.
• Political Context: The potential influence of inflammatory political rhetoric on the incident, linking statements from political figures to the motivations behind the attack.

The Action Plan – What Americans Will Demand Next

1. Review and Overhaul Security Protocols: Conduct a comprehensive review of the Secret Service’s procedures, particularly those related to high-profile events.
2. Enhance Communication Channels: Ensure better communication and response to eyewitness reports and intelligence.
3. Increase Security Presence: Ensure thorough coverage of all potential vantage points and maintain a robust security presence similar to past rallies.
4. Address Political Rhetoric: Engage in public discourse to mitigate the impact of inflammatory statements and reduce the likelihood of politically motivated violence.

Additional Points for Further Research Beyond this Article

Lack of Public Accountability: What are the public accountability mechanisms within the Secret Service and other security agencies? Specifically, there is no mention of how these agencies plan to address the failures and prevent similar incidents in the future, nor any calls for transparent investigations and public reporting on findings.

Psychological Impact on Attendees: There is a negative psychological and emotional impact of the assassination attempt on the rally attendees and the broader public. There has been no mention for the need for mental health support and public reassurance following such traumatic events to restore a sense of safety and trust.

Looking Ahead

The Trump shooting incident exposes significant failures within the Secret Service and broader security protocols. The American public deserves transparency and accountability to ensure such lapses do not recur. As the investigation unfolds, it is imperative to address these critical questions and take necessary actions to restore confidence in the security measures designed to protect national leaders.

FAQs about the Trump Shooting Incident